This paper departs from the global existence of aggressive tax planning practices by multinational companies through which they minimize their tax bills to the detriment of government fiscal revenues, which in turn fail to properly provide adequate public services. While the discussions over the matter have conquered the legal scholarship, the same topic has so far called little attention under Rwandan law. The practice over the same issue also does not stand far from that. In that respect, the key focus of this paper is to analyze the situation of aggressive tax planning in Rwanda, from a regulatory approach to a practical approach. Produced mainly using a doctrinal approach, this paper criticizes the inapplicability of domestic taxation approaches while dealing with the taxation of international transactions

REFERENCES

1.       Law No. 016/2018 of 13/04/2018 establishing taxes on income, in O.G.No. 16 of 16/04/2018.
2. Law no 16/2005 of 18/08/2005 on direct taxes on income, OG (no 1 of 01/01/2006) as modified and completed by the law no 73/2008 of 31/12/2008, OG (no 19 of 11/05/2009), the law no 24/2010 of 28/05/2010, OG (no special of 28/05/2010), and the law no 28/2012 of 27/07/2012, OG (no 37 of 10/09/2012).
3. Law no 06/2015 of 28/03/2015 relating to investment promotion and facilitation, commonly referred to as Investment Law, OG (no special of 27/05/2015).
4. Rwanda Revenue Authority v. Total Rwanda Sarl / Engen Rwanda Ltd, RComA 0027/12/CS, 13 May 2016.
5. MTN Rwanda Ltd v. RRA, RCOM 0710/13/TC/NYGE, 17/12/2013.
6. Avi-Yonah, R. S., “Rethinking Treaty Shopping: Lessons for the European Union”, in C H Panayi, Tax Treaties: Building Bridges between Law and Economics, 21-50, Amsterdam: IBFD, 2010.
7. Beer, S., Mooij R. and Liu, L., International Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Review of the Channels, Magnitudes, and Blind Spots, IMF Working Paper WP/18/168, 2018.
8. Burgers, I. & Mosquera, I J., ‘Corporate Taxation and BEPS: A Fair Slice for Developing Countries?’, Erasmus Law Review, August 2017, No. 1.
9. Christensen, R. C., Professional Competition in Global Tax Reform: The Case of BEPS Action 13, Master’s Thesis, Copenhagen Business School, 2015.
10. Fichtner, J. J. & Michel, A. N., “The OECD’s Conquest of the United States: Understanding the Costs and Consequences of the BEPS Project and Tax Harmonisation”, Mercatus Research, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Arlington, VA, March 2016.
11. Hines, R. J. Jr., “How Serious is the Problem of Base Erosion and Profit Shifting?”, Canadian Tax Journal / Revue Fiscale Canadienne (2014) 62:2, 443-53.
12. Joint Committee on Taxation, Background, Summary and Implications of the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, JCX-139-15, November 2015.
13. Kristiaji, B. B., Incentives and Disincentives of Profit Shifting in developing Countries, Master Thesis - International Business Tax Economics, Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Economics and Management, 2015.
14. Mosquera, I J, ‘Legitimacy and the Making of International Tax Law: The Challenges of Multilateralism’, World Tax Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2015.
15. Oguttu, A. W., Tax Base Erosion and Profit Shifting in Africa: A Critique of some Priority OECD Actions from an Africa Perspective, WP 64, ICTD, February 2017.
16. 16.  Oguttu, A. W., ‘Tax Base Erosion and Profit Shifting in Africa: Africa’s
17. Response to the OECD BEPS Action Plan’, WP 54, ICTD, June 2016.
18. Piantavigna, P., ‘Tax Abuse and Aggressive Tax Planning in the BEPS Era: How EU Law and the OECD are Establishing a Unifying Conceptual Framework in International Tax Law, despite Linguistic Discrepancies’, World Tax Journal, February 2017.
19.       UNECA, Base Erosion and Profit Shifting in Africa: Reforms to Facilitate
20.       Improved Taxation of Multinational Enterprises, Addis Ababa, 2018.
21.          Waris, A., “Taxing Intra-Company Transfers: The Law and its Application in Rwanda”, Bulletin for International Taxation, 2013, vol. 67, No 12.